Quadratic Diophantine Theorem - sci.math

Message from discussion Quadratic Diophantine Theorem

Dirk Van de moortel

More options Sep 6 2008, 4:37 pm

Newsgroups: alt.math.undergrad, alt.math.recreational, sci.math

From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com>

Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:37:02 +0200

Local: Sat, Sep 6 2008 4:37 pm

Subject: Re: Quadratic Diophantine Theorem

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message

reply_in_group-A24F6C.22040805092...@news.supernews.com

> In article <t_hwk.629411$7f3.176...@newsfe23.ams2>,
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:

>> JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> 7ce79450-0709-4634-b6b7-095b7a59e...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com
>>> Quadratic Diophantine Theorem:

>> [snip]

>>> The theorem is proven easily using what I call tautological spaces.

>> The famous spaces in which whatever pops into
>> James Harris' mind is correct by proxy.

> Do you happen to have a counterexample to his alleged theorem, or some
> other way to show that it is not correct?

I never even *look* at anything between his opening and closing
line anymore.
Not after this:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ArmyMath.html

Dirk Vdm

Reply to author Forward