The difference with the Quadratic Diophantine Theorem is that the lies
are not so easy.

My other "pure math" results were either complicated or traveled over
previous ground just enough that posters would just claim there wasn't
anything important about them, like my prime counting function.

But with this result in an area where there is over a thousand years
of research going back to ancient Asia, and the Greeks, and including
Fermat and Gauss, there is no other result like this one in terms of
reach.

Remarkably though in the initial replies I see an indication of those
among you who know very little if any number theory or you'd have some
inkling that it's better to wait on this one, as otherwise you look
real stupid, if it's correct.

And I can assure you the theorem IS correct.

Those wishing to see the proof can just check my math blog and see how
easily it is derived, though it was over a thousand years in the
finding.

History being made.  Fun!!!