Web Images Maps News Groups Books Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Playning with magnets and their equal strength
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
BURT  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 6:39 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 6:39 am
Subject: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
If you have two equal magnets being brought together experience only
one strangth of magnetism. Magnets don't get any strong even while
closer in their two fields. Experiment and you will see.

Mitch Raemsch


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Aleph  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 6:59 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
Followup-To: sci.physics
From: Aleph <Usenet....@gishpuppy.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:59:01 GMT
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 6:59 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On 29/10/2009 22:39, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> gave it no where near
enough thought and then wrote:

> <snip>

Yawn.

Is the best you can do after so much practice. You could always, dare I
say it, try to learn something?

No, I know. That really is asking too much, isnt it?

--
Aleph

This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harbinger  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 7:33 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: Harbinger <jhnguiney...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 7:33 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On 29 Oct, 22:39, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> If you have two equal magnets being brought together experience only
> one strangth of magnetism. Magnets don't get any strong even while
> closer in their two fields. Experiment and you will see.

> Mitch Raemsch

Astral projection is the answer!

Yrs

John.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Igor  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 10:05 pm
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: Igor <thoov...@excite.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 10:05 pm
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On Oct 29, 6:39 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> If you have two equal magnets being brought together experience only
> one strangth of magnetism. Magnets don't get any strong even while
> closer in their two fields. Experiment and you will see.

> Mitch Raemsch

Speak English, Alvarado.  Or maybe Porgie and Mudhead could help you
out on this one.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Geopelia  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 4:09 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: "Geopelia" <phildo...@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:09:04 +1300
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 4:09 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength

"Igor" <thoov...@excite.com> wrote in message

news:4999b920-cc91-4687-b371-64b36d176bfb@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 29, 6:39 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> If you have two equal magnets being brought together experience only
> one strangth of magnetism. Magnets don't get any strong even while
> closer in their two fields. Experiment and you will see.

> Mitch Raemsch

Speak English, Alvarado.  Or maybe Porgie and Mudhead could help you
out on this one.

It depends which parts of the magnets you are trying to put together. Some
repel each other.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BURT  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 6:51 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 6:51 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On Nov 3, 12:09 pm, "Geopelia" <phildo...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

It is still the same strength in repulsion or attraction.

Mitch Raemsch


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zzbunker@netscape.net  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 12:34 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 12:34 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On Nov 3, 5:51 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

   But that's also why the people who understand strength of
materials,
   long ago stopped working on permanment magnets, and started working
   on electro-magents, and robots.
   And it's also why the people who understand history and rain
started working on
   post-watt engines and self-replicating machines and stopped working
on horse shoes.
   And it's also why the people who understand navigation started
working
   on GPS, Cruise Missiles, Drones, Cyber Batteries, and UAVs, and
stopped working with the Navy.
   And it's also why the people who understand engineering, started
working
   on Multiplexed Fiber Optics, USB, External Harddisks,  Flat Sceen
Debuggers,
   Flash Memory, Holographics, Laser Disks, mp3, mpeg, HDTV, Blue Ray,
Home Broadband,
   All-In-One Printers, Desktop Publishing, On-Line Publishing,
Distributed Processing Software.
   Reverse Compilers,  Post ACME Screwthreads, Weather Satellites,
Data Fusion, Digital Terrain Mapping,
   Pv Cell Energy, Digital Books, Cyber Batteries, and Compact
Flouescent Lighting,
   and stopped working  with optical computer cranks.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BURT  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 3:20 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 3:20 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength
On Nov 4, 8:34 am, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
wrote:

Magnetism is all even strength. A magnet has only one strength no
matter what proximity in the field. Of course it must be in the two
dirtections of the force or both attraction and repulsion. There is
weigh from repulsion too. It is an aether.

Mitch Raemsch

You can test it


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Geopelia  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 4:42 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, rec.org.mensa, sci.math
From: "Geopelia" <phildo...@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:42:53 +1300
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 4:42 am
Subject: Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength

<zzbun...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:a6c79978-00bf-47fa-8452-f68076766e96@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 3, 5:51 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

   But that's also why the people who understand strength of
materials,
   long ago stopped working on permanment magnets, and started working
   on electro-magents, and robots.
   And it's also why the people who understand history and rain
started working on
   post-watt engines and self-replicating machines and stopped working
on horse shoes.
   And it's also why the people who understand navigation started
working
   on GPS, Cruise Missiles, Drones, Cyber Batteries, and UAVs, and
stopped working with the Navy.
   And it's also why the people who understand engineering, started
working
   on Multiplexed Fiber Optics, USB, External Harddisks,  Flat Sceen
Debuggers,
   Flash Memory, Holographics, Laser Disks, mp3, mpeg, HDTV, Blue Ray,
Home Broadband,
   All-In-One Printers, Desktop Publishing, On-Line Publishing,
Distributed Processing Software.
   Reverse Compilers,  Post ACME Screwthreads, Weather Satellites,
Data Fusion, Digital Terrain Mapping,
   Pv Cell Energy, Digital Books, Cyber Batteries, and Compact
Flouescent Lighting,
   and stopped working  with optical computer cranks.

-------------------------------

It might be nice to know how all that stuff works.
But as long as it works, why worry?

They ought to simplify some of the manuals though, for dumb people who want
to use these marvellous contraptions.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google