Web Images Maps News Groups Books Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
CMOS MUX peak current?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 351 - 375 of 395 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older  Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Spehro Pefhany  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 12:37 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Spehro Pefhany <speffS...@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:37:02 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 12:37 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:48:05 -0800,

If it's a rare occurence, probably okay, but metal migration induced
failures due to exceeding the maximum current density on a
metallization layer is an obvious possibility. Personally, I'd put a
<$0.001 resistor in there if it's happening at relatively high
frequency and relatively high duty cycle and perhaps at elevated
temperatures. I don't think the abs max ratings are a joke.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Ping Larkin" by ChrisQ
ChrisQ  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 12:58 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:58:56 +0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 12:58 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin

krw wrote:
> Just what I like, a regressive tax.  ;-)

The way it works is that the tax is made on the final product. If you
buy in parts, services or just about anything used in the course of
business, you are allowed to reclaim the vat before it is finally sold.
The final tax is charged on the finished product sold to the consumer. I
guess it could be considered regressive, but most taxes are where non
essentials are concerned. Not that i'm defending it, just explaining how
it works.

> No way.  How do you expect the Demonicrats to control society without
> the power to tax indiscriminately?

I can't really comment on that, but many people in europe, including
myself, were gratefull for any change that got rid of Bush and co,
irrespective of which party he hailed from.

In the end, it's not the *party*, but what's best for the *country* at
any given time. It's always a compromise between what you as an
individual think and the rest. It's an insult to the intelligence to
suggest that any one party always has all the right answers.

In the uk, the labour party have been in power since for ever. They will
almost certainly be kicked out in the elections next year, because they
are seen as being a spent force, are becoming too arrogant,
authoritarian, lacking clue and are completely out of touch with the
mood of the nation.

Labour are supposed to be the left wing party and much was expected of
them to solve some serious social issues, but they failed completely and
got us involved in an unwinnable (we can debate that) war, who's ethical
justification has never been demonstrated.   Add to that all the stasi
like stuff they are trying to introduce and it's a classic case of
reversion to type. Closet authoritarian and anti libertarian to a man :-)...

Regards,

Chris


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "CMOS MUX peak current?" by Jim Thompson
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:53 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:53:45 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:53 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:37:02 -0500, Spehro Pefhany

Indeed!  I'd, just on the face of the absolute maximum ratings, add
250 Ohms in series..

I'm not sure that people are aware, but the 4051, 4052, 4053 are all
the same basic chip, only the wiring (metalization) changes between
the types.

See...

http://www.analog-innovations.com/SED/My4053Top.pdf

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

  Obama says, "I AM NOT a cry baby, Fox REALLY IS out to get me!"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Ping Larkin" by John Larkin
John Larkin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:36 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:36:41 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:36 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin

Why?

John


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:41 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:41:09 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:41 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:36:41 -0800, John Larkin

The rest of the world, particularly Europeons, can't cope with feeling
inferior and in need of protection.

They needn't worry anymore, they're soon to be converts to Islam ;-)

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

            When the Islamic Muslims take over Europe
          I will be amongst the first to join the call:
           "It's not our war, it's just a civil war."


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ChrisQ  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:34 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:34:55 +0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:34 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin

John Larkin wrote:

> Why?

> John

9/11 was probably the worst terrorist act that the us, or for that
matter any other country has experienced, but I think it was done to
provoke the lion. The lion was provoked and we got a kneejerk reaction
when a more reasoned response may have saved 100's of thousands of lives
worldwide. Bush didn't have the balls and / or the experience to hold
the line against the shrill cry for war. Instead, we got the politics of
fear and appeal to man's most base instincts to justify invading a
country that was nothing to do with it and was no real threat to anyone,
as all the inspectors found when they got there. This is no religious
stuff either, but about the values that all people of all nations hold
in common.

I don't really want to get into all this, as it's not the forum, but
could have wept for the us after 9/11 and the years that followed. The
physical damage can be mended, but the damage to individual families and
the psyche of the nation could take decades to repair, if ever...

Regards,

Chris


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Larkin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:09 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:09:19 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:09 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin

Going after Al Queda in Afghanistan, and squashing the government that
sheltered them, was necessary.

I personally believe that GB perceived that the only longterm fix to
the clash of cultures was to plant a working democracy in the heart of
the Muslim world, and that Iraq was the ideal place to do it. Nothing
"base" about that.

Seems to be working so far. And based on Sadaam's time-averaged
slaughter rate, it has saved lives thus far.

John


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
krw  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:43 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:43:24 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:43 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:09:19 -0800, John Larkin

Absolutely.

>I personally believe that GB perceived that the only longterm fix to
>the clash of cultures was to plant a working democracy in the heart of
>the Muslim world, and that Iraq was the ideal place to do it. Nothing
>"base" about that.

Yep.  We'll see if Obama can screw it up.  All of the Demonicrats have
tried, no reason to believe he'll do any differently.

>Seems to be working so far. And based on Sadaam's time-averaged
>slaughter rate, it has saved lives thus far.

When one goes to war, minimization of loss on the other side is a nice
thing to do, but hardly the point.  The Iraqis are on the road to a
free society.  That's worth something.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
krw  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:47 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:47:39 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:47 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:58:56 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote:
>krw wrote:

>> Just what I like, a regressive tax.  ;-)

>The way it works is that the tax is made on the final product. If you
>buy in parts, services or just about anything used in the course of
>business, you are allowed to reclaim the vat before it is finally sold.
>The final tax is charged on the finished product sold to the consumer. I
>guess it could be considered regressive, but most taxes are where non
>essentials are concerned. Not that i'm defending it, just explaining how
>it works.

We all know how it works.  I said I liked progressive taxes.  Those
that use government services pay for them, which is only right.

>> No way.  How do you expect the Demonicrats to control society without
>> the power to tax indiscriminately?

>I can't really comment on that, but many people in europe, including
>myself, were gratefull for any change that got rid of Bush and co,
>irrespective of which party he hailed from.

More Europeon "logic".  Say Hi to slowman, when you kiss.

>In the end, it's not the *party*, but what's best for the *country* at
>any given time. It's always a compromise between what you as an
>individual think and the rest. It's an insult to the intelligence to
>suggest that any one party always has all the right answers.

The *party* stands for something.  That's why the *party* is
important.

>In the uk, the labour party have been in power since for ever. They will
>almost certainly be kicked out in the elections next year, because they
>are seen as being a spent force, are becoming too arrogant,
>authoritarian, lacking clue and are completely out of touch with the
>mood of the nation.

The Demonicrats have only been in power 11 months and are already too
arrogant, authoritarian, lacking clue and are completely out of touch
with the mood of the nation.

>Labour are supposed to be the left wing party and much was expected of
>them to solve some serious social issues, but they failed completely and
>got us involved in an unwinnable (we can debate that) war, who's ethical
>justification has never been demonstrated.   Add to that all the stasi
>like stuff they are trying to introduce and it's a classic case of
>reversion to type. Closet authoritarian and anti libertarian to a man :-)...

You think lefties are going to solve *any* problems?  The dew's still
wet on you.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "CMOS MUX peak current?" by Joerg
Joerg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 10:31 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:31:00 -0800
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

So, does it now say "Thompson Tuning" on the ON Semi masks or at least a
smiley somewhere?

BTW do you take on HV chip designs, stuff at 50V and above? Of course,
getting it into a foundry would be a whole 'nother game.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 12:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:38:05 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:31:00 -0800, Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

If you have a true need, X-Fab have several HV processes.

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

I love to cook with wine.     Sometimes I even put it in the food.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joerg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 12:44 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:44:51 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:44 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

Yes, thanks, some are mentioned on their site but without voltage data.
I've read up to 650V somewhere. I didn't know they still had them. AMS
offers a 120V 0.35um process as well. I like the link "Tip-a-friend" on
the X-Fab web site. So far I've only tipped restaurant personnel, the
barber, mail carrier and so on ... :-)

The true need might arise early next year, I will know more about that
in a couple of weeks.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:01 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:01:44 -0700
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:01 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:44:51 -0800, Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

No ;-)  I haven't been involved in layout (except for matching
guidance and LVS support) for probably 20 years now.

I have several sub-contractors who handle my layout needs if the
customer doesn't already have such a design team.

>>> BTW do you take on HV chip designs, stuff at 50V and above? Of course,
>>> getting it into a foundry would be a whole 'nother game.

>> If you have a true need, X-Fab have several HV processes.

>Yes, thanks, some are mentioned on their site but without voltage data.
>I've read up to 650V somewhere. I didn't know they still had them. AMS
>offers a 120V 0.35um process as well. I like the link "Tip-a-friend" on
>the X-Fab web site. So far I've only tipped restaurant personnel, the
>barber, mail carrier and so on ... :-)

>The true need might arise early next year, I will know more about that
>in a couple of weeks.

"AMS", while now a separate entity (East Germany), is essentially the
research arm of X-Fab.

X-Fab has foundries around the world, with one in Lubbock, TX.

I've E-mailed you USA contact information.

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

  Obama says, "I AM NOT a cry baby, Fox REALLY IS out to get me!"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael A. Terrell  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 2:50 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:50:31 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 2:50 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

Joerg wrote:

> Yes, thanks, some are mentioned on their site but without voltage data.
> I've read up to 650V somewhere. I didn't know they still had them. AMS
> offers a 120V 0.35um process as well. I like the link "Tip-a-friend" on
> the X-Fab web site. So far I've only tipped restaurant personnel, the
> barber, mail carrier and so on ... :-)

   And a few cows?

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joerg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:38 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:38:51 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:38 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>> Yes, thanks, some are mentioned on their site but without voltage data.
>> I've read up to 650V somewhere. I didn't know they still had them. AMS
>> offers a 120V 0.35um process as well. I like the link "Tip-a-friend" on
>> the X-Fab web site. So far I've only tipped restaurant personnel, the
>> barber, mail carrier and so on ... :-)

>    And a few cows?

No, I would never do that. Would be wrong, those animals provide so much
to us.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael A. Terrell  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:51 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:51:06 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:51 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

   How about outhouse tipping? ;-)

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
krw  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:53 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:53:31 -0600
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:53 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:51:06 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"

Restaraunts, sure, but only only Slowman tips at outhouses.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 5:05 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:05:33 -0700
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:05 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:51:06 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"

My father told of pranks where they'd move the outhouse back from the
pit on a dark night ;-)

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

  Obama says, "I AM NOT a cry baby, Fox REALLY IS out to get me!"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joerg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 5:13 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:13:02 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:13 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

   ^^^^^^^^^^^

Hey, your new southern drawl begins to show :-)

--
SCNR, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
krw  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 6:48 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:48:13 -0600
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 6:48 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:13:02 -0800, Joerg <inva...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

...and the speelchecker didn't catch it, either.  Two "only"s, also. I
had so many ways to say what I wanted.  At least the message was
correct.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael A. Terrell  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 11:20 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:20:16 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 11:20 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

   My dad told me when he was a kid that an old man spent the night in
his outhouse on Halloween to keep kids from tipping it.  He was still
inside as it rolled down the hill by some older kids.  it would have
just tipped over, if he wasn't standing on the seat when they tipped it.

   The lids would go around the next day and help set them back on their
foundation, but he had to build a new outhouse, on top of all his
bruises.  :(

   City folks don't know that the outhouse had to be moved from time to
time, since they couldn't be pumped out, like Sloman.

   I always wondered why they weren't built on runners so they could be
towed to the new hole by their plow mules or horses?

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael A. Terrell  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 11:20 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:20:47 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 11:20 am
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?

   Sloman 'is' an outhouse.

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 10:45 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:45:17 -0700
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 10:45 pm
Subject: Re: CMOS MUX peak current?
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:20:16 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"

They were...on "skids".

                                        ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

  Obama says, "I AM NOT a cry baby, Fox REALLY IS out to get me!"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Ping Larkin" by JosephKK
JosephKK  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 12:44 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "JosephKK"<quiettechb...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:44:42 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 12:44 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:50:14 -0800, John Larkin

Brokerage fees are mostly gone now, and on average the various asset
manage management fees are way excessive (largely hangovers from the
early 1900s when it took considerable resources).

>And the more subtle extraction of
>value from the system by can't-lose automated trading, inside deals,
>VC parasitism, and management cut-outs.

All of these occur, however not all VC are parasites, though an
unmanageable high proportion are.

>In Las Vegas at least you get
>free drinks.

>Whining minds are answered.

Since when is asking a question whining?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
JosephKK  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 12:49 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "JosephKK"<quiettechb...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:49:38 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 12:49 am
Subject: Re: Ping Larkin
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:58:23 -0800, John Larkin

Nice dodge.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 351 - 375 of 395 < Older  Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google