Web Images Maps News Groups Books Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
IC to NPN transistor
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jonathan Kirwan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2006, 5:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics, sci.electronics.design
Followup-To: sci.electronics.basics
From: Jonathan Kirwan <jkir...@easystreet.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:38:30 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 22 2006 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:39:10 +1000, "Johnny Boy" <NoS...@Please.com>
wrote:

This thread should be in sci.electronics.basics, I think.  Adding it
there, with followups set to .basics.

Johnny, the transistor's beta is 200 only if it is kept out of
saturation and even then only if not at too high currents, often.  So
the situation is probably still worse than just the 600uA versus 400uA
would otherwise indicate.

I think this kind of thing does call for two transistors, to relieve
the load on the IC output.

:      +4.5V
:        |
:        |
:        \
:        / R2       +4.5V
:        \ 4.5k       |
:        /            |
:        |          |<e Q2
:        +----------|   PNP
:        |          |\c
:      |/c Q1         |
: IN---|   NPN        |
:      |>e            +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----,
:3.5V    |            |     |     |     |     |     |
:400uA   |            \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R
:max     \            / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39
:        / R1         \     \     \     \     \     \
:        \ 1k         |     |     |     |     |     |
:        /            v     v     v     v     v     v LEDs
:        |            -     -     -     -     -     -
:        |            |     |     |     |     |     |
:       gnd          gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd

But this would mean a PNP capable of the loading.

Q1 gets close to saturation in this case because Q1's collector
probably has to get dragged down some 800-900mV.  That places it very
close to the Q1 base voltage, when on.  So if the 3.5V drive is a
little higher up than 3.5V (and it might very well be) then the base
drive current will rise a lot.  So really this isn't so good, even
though it really limits the drive current -- if the Q1 base voltage is
kept low enough to keep Q1 out of saturation, but not so well
otherwise.

So perhaps a better circuit using another resistor is:

:             +4.5V
:               |
:               |
:               \
:               / R2       +4.5V
:               \ 15k        |
:               /            |
:               |    R3    |<e Q2
:               +---/\/\---|   PNP
:               |    1k    |\c
:       R1    |/c Q1         |
: IN---/\/\---|   NPN        |
:       15k   |>e            +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----,
:3.5V           |            |     |     |     |     |     |
:400uA          |            \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R   \ R
:max           gnd           / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39  / 39
:                            \     \     \     \     \     \
:                            |     |     |     |     |     |
:                            v     v     v     v     v     v LEDs
:                            -     -     -     -     -     -
:                            |     |     |     |     |     |
:                           gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd   gnd

That will load the IC output more, as Q1 is also saturated now, but it
will deal with an input voltage that spans the likely range and the
worst case current is about half the IC output max spec of 400uA.

Jon


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fred Bartoli  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2006, 5:48 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Fred Bartoli <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:48:33 +0200
Local: Sun, Oct 22 2006 5:48 pm
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
Jonathan Kirwan a écrit :
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:39:10 +1000, "Johnny Boy" <NoS...@Please.com>
> wrote:

>> <Digitm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1161498877.726962.314130@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>>> Hey I need some help calculating some resister values, I cant seem to
>>> find the formula anywhere. I'm trying to trigger a NPN transistor to
>>> switch on a set of leds when my IC's output goes HIGH. Heres my values:

<...>
<...>

Woaw... 2 transistors and 3 resistors.

Just use the right transistor for this: logic level mosfet.

--
Thanks,
Fred.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jonathan Kirwan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2006, 6:01 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Jonathan Kirwan <jkir...@easystreet.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:01:23 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 22 2006 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:48:33 +0200, Fred Bartoli

<fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote:
>Woaw... 2 transistors and 3 resistors.

>Just use the right transistor for this: logic level mosfet.

Makes sense.  Particularly in the 120mA region.

I know that just about any cheap NPN and PNP will work in the circuit
I gave.  Junk box stuff.  I'm not nearly as familiar with MOSFETs. Can
you point me to a good example of any one that would work great with
3.5V on its gate?  I'd like to learn more, myself.

Jon


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fred Bartoli  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2006, 7:28 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Fred Bartoli <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:28:26 +0200
Local: Sun, Oct 22 2006 7:28 pm
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
Jonathan Kirwan a écrit :

> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:48:33 +0200, Fred Bartoli
> <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote:

>> Woaw... 2 transistors and 3 resistors.

>> Just use the right transistor for this: logic level mosfet.

> Makes sense.  Particularly in the 120mA region.

> I know that just about any cheap NPN and PNP will work in the circuit
> I gave.  Junk box stuff.  I'm not nearly as familiar with MOSFETs. Can
> you point me to a good example of any one that would work great with
> 3.5V on its gate?  I'd like to learn more, myself.

Sure. Just plug logic level mosfet or digital mosfet into any mos
manufacturer website and you'll find plenty of.

For example http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/FD%2FFDV301N.pdf  should fit
the bill.
Or the more capable http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/ND%2FNDS331N.pdf

Even the good old 2N7002, if the logic is 5V CMOS may just do it. I
didn't checked at 120mA, but given the price, just use 2, or run the
leds lower than 20mA each.

--
Thanks,
Fred.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PeteS  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2006, 10:51 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: PeteS <peter.smith8...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:51:06 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 22 2006 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor

The PMV45EN would easily handle this; SOT23, 5.4A ID(max), Vgs(th) 2.2V
(max across temperature) for ID = 1mA.

I use this as a power switch from logic levels (3.3V system) and I've
never had an issue with it.

Interestingly, the datasheet also specs the sub-threshold leakage
currents, which is unusual but useful.

Cheers

PeteS


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
digitm...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Oct 23 2006, 1:15 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Digitm...@gmail.com
Date: 22 Oct 2006 10:15:01 -0700
Local: Mon, Oct 23 2006 1:15 am
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
Thanks for your help and for the diagram, one small problem though. My
second power source is 9 volts not 4.5 volts. The chip is running of 5
volts and leds are running off 9 volts operating at 4.5 volts. So is it
better to use individual resistors to each led instead of one higher 1
watt resistor?

Thanks again you guys rock.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PeteS  
View profile  
 More options Oct 23 2006, 1:48 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: PeteS <peter.smith8...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:48:58 GMT
Local: Mon, Oct 23 2006 1:48 am
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor
Digitm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for your help and for the diagram, one small problem though. My
> second power source is 9 volts not 4.5 volts. The chip is running of 5
> volts and leds are running off 9 volts operating at 4.5 volts. So is it
> better to use individual resistors to each led instead of one higher 1
> watt resistor?

> Thanks again you guys rock.

It's usually best to use a resistor for each LED to prevent current
hogging from the lowest resistance LED (they will have varying
characteristics).

Cheers

PeteS


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rich Grise  
View profile  
 More options Oct 25 2006, 6:30 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Rich Grise <r...@example.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:30:57 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 25 2006 6:30 am
Subject: Re: IC to NPN transistor

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:15:01 -0700, Digitmode wrote:
> Thanks for your help and for the diagram, one small problem though. My
> second power source is 9 volts not 4.5 volts. The chip is running of 5
> volts and leds are running off 9 volts operating at 4.5 volts. So is it
> better to use individual resistors to each led instead of one higher 1
> watt resistor?

> Thanks again you guys rock.

It's better to put LEDs in series, unless there's a serious variation
in brightness at the same current, in the same batch.

Just add up the VF's or, say, three LEDs and calculate your resistor
as (9V - (Vftotal)) / Iled, unless I've gotten it upside down. ;-)

That way your switch transistor doesn't have to handle all of that current,
and you waste much less power in dropping resistors.

Good Luck!
Rich


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google