|
|
rec.pets.cats.health+behav |
flyer...@my-deja.com wrote in <82ehf3$23...@nnrp1.deja.com>: Certainly, it would have been best if the company had not had any problems to Cheers,
>It appears that the company has already acknowledged a problem and has I agree. A boycott would send the message of "You can't please these people
>taken positive steps to address same. I guess the argument could
>always be made that these steps are not enough, but since the company
>appears to be in a receptive mode, a correspondence to them with
>recommendations would seem to me to be more in order than a boycott.
no matter what" -- not a message that's conducive to change.
begin with. But it's not a perfect world; the next best thing is that they
speedily and effectively correct those problems. And have the corrections
checked and reported on by other agencies, of course.
Holly