Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Petsmart in the UK - animal abuse exposed
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Holly E. Ordway  
View profile
 More options Dec 6 1999, 4:00 pm
Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: holly-ord...@home.com.xxx (Holly E. Ordway)
Date: 1999/12/06
Subject: Re: Petsmart in the UK - animal abuse exposed
flyer...@my-deja.com wrote in <82ehf3$23...@nnrp1.deja.com>:

>It appears that the company has already acknowledged a problem and has
>taken positive steps to address same.  I guess the argument could
>always be made that these steps are not enough, but since the company
>appears to be in a receptive mode, a correspondence to them with
>recommendations would seem to me to be more in order than a boycott.

I agree. A boycott would send the message of "You can't please these people
no matter what" -- not a message that's conducive to change.

Certainly, it would have been best if the company had not had any problems to
begin with. But it's not a perfect world; the next best thing is that they
speedily and effectively correct those problems. And have the corrections
checked and reported on by other agencies, of course.

Cheers,
Holly


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google