>>> "Stu" <reci...@foodforu.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:u612f5p1b04nnvofk83gtlkc8u48ma264k@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:54:19 -0600, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost>
>>> wrote:

>>>> -->On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:30:31 -0500, skeeter wrote:
>>>> -->
>>>> -->> say it ain't so sqwertz. I followed jerry's posts with great
>>> adoration and
>>>> -->> found lots of great humor in his "breaking news" posts and his
>>> outlandish
>>>> -->> reviews.  this is a sad day indeed. you broke my heart sqwertz .
>>>> I'll
>>>> never
>>>> -->> believe anything in usenet ever again.
>>>> -->
>>>> -->You'll get over it.  I don't want to hear no crying either.
>>>> -->
>>>> -->-sw

>>>> posting off highwinds media in florida, does this Jerry live in florida?

>>> The real Jerry, ME, posts from WISCONSIN.

>> but is WISCONSIN real, or just some rumor spread by the media?

>> your pal,
>> blake

> Its a fictional place used in that 70's show!

> Robert

>> But you kept screwing up punctuation grammar and spelling MORE often
>> that a genuine stupid person would have.  That was a dead giveaway
>> that the person who wrote it knew the rules, and was intentionally
>> breaking them.

> Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are all optional.

> (I loved using that one)

> -sw

>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
>>>Sunday
>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have to
>>>have
>>>fun.

>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

> As she posts to aff-f...

> Like I said, sf is just trolling.  You're it.

> -sw

>>"sf" <s...@geemail.com> wrote in message
>>news:q5q4f5dbkn29ms7u41tfj0urih0m0iv63m@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
>>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
>>>>Sunday
>>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have to
>>>>have
>>>>fun.

>>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

>>You can go wherever you want nobody can stop you. I just said you need to
>>stop trying to control everybody.

> It's not a matter of control unless you're talking to yourself.  Stop
> cross posting (a matter of YOUR self-control) to rfc and all will be
> fine.

> --
> I love cooking with wine.
> Sometimes I even put it in the food.

>> "sf" <s...@geemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:0g63f5li4p2f2e8of01rh4gda3hr3o828f@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:15:09 -0500, "Robert"
>>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>If you had been sick to death how are you posting.
>>>>Are you dead like Jerry?
>>>>Oh what is a Juveline?

>>> And you still can't stop cross posting your little side show.

>>> --
>>> I love cooking with wine.
>>> Sometimes I even put it in the food.

>> Sorry but I am not Sqwertz

>> Robert

> *you're* sorry?

> your pal,
> blake

>And why haven't you killfiled this thread yet??

> > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:20:11 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:42:13 -0800 (PST), Food Snob® wrote:

> >>> I make no secret of who I am.  You, and everyone else knows my real
> >>> name and my location.

> >> You're Steve Austin!

> >> OK.  I admit.  I'm Bryan/Food Snob/Bobo The Clown, too.

> > steve never sleeps!

> I have one of those 'Threesome Alarm Clocks'.  It will wake up to
> three people on three different schedules.  I use it to wake up me,
> myself, and I so we can start posting as other people for a few
> hours each.

> It's tough work considering I have a day job, too.

> -sw

> > "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> > news:p251el6g8m5l.prn@sqwertz.com...
> >> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:32 -0800, sf wrote:

> >>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
> >>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
> >>>>Sunday
> >>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have to
> >>>>have
> >>>>fun.

> >>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

> >> As she posts to aff-f...

> >> Like I said, sf is just trolling.  You're it.

> > So are you!

> My intentions of crossposting (or even starting) this thread was not
> to troll.

> -sw

>> Steve/Robert/Jerry - I can't wade through all this thread.  You've
>> entirely too much time on your hands.  Pick a favorite charity, work
>> for Habitat for Humanity, go for a hike, but at least pick something
>> meaningful.

> Oh please.  I'll agree this is total silliness but it's confined to
> one thread and easily killfiled.  A dead cat occupied MULTIPLE threads
> for a whole day and nobody said anything except for Greg and Barb in
> tactful jabs.  Yet a few people being playful get everyone in a
> dither.  From what I noticed the only hostility came from those who
> didn't know what was going on.  It's real simple, just don't read the
> thread.

>> Steve/Robert/Jerry - I can't wade through all this thread.  You've
>> entirely too much time on your hands.  Pick a favorite charity, work
>> for Habitat for Humanity, go for a hike, but at least pick something
>> meaningful.

> Oh please.  I'll agree this is total silliness but it's confined to
> one thread and easily killfiled.  A dead cat occupied MULTIPLE threads
> for a whole day and nobody said anything except for Greg and Barb in
> tactful jabs.  Yet a few people being playful get everyone in a
> dither.  From what I noticed the only hostility came from those who
> didn't know what was going on.  It's real simple, just don't read the
> thread.

> And by the way,  I also see you're involved in (yet another) thread
> with a poster about a deceased child.   I'm fumbling for the word, but
> hypocrite comes to mind.

> Lou

> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> news:14m3xxy5f994j$.prn@sqwertz.com...
>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:55:50 -0500, Robert wrote:

>> > "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> > news:p251el6g8m5l.prn@sqwertz.com...
>> >> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:32 -0800, sf wrote:

>> >>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
>> >>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> >>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
>> >>>>Sunday
>> >>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have
>> >>>>to
>> >>>>have
>> >>>>fun.

>> >>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

>> >> As she posts to aff-f...

>> >> Like I said, sf is just trolling.  You're it.

>> > So are you!

>> My intentions of crossposting (or even starting) this thread was not
>> to troll.

>> -sw

> Your intenetions are quit obvious.  You wanted to start a discussion to me
> but you weren't man enough to admit you never kill-filed me in
> alt.fast-food, which is the reason your posting to BOTH r.f.c and a.f.f.

> Admit it!  Why post such crap to r.f.c where you already admitted you
> never
> kilf-filed me there from?

>>On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:32 -0800, sf wrote:

>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
>>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
>>>>Sunday
>>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have to
>>>>have
>>>>fun.

>>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

>>As she posts to aff-f...

>>Like I said, sf is just trolling.  You're it.

> yep.  You brought this sh*t to rfc, now you're getting it back.  Stop
> cross posting and I will too.

> Your intenetions are quit obvious.  You wanted to start a discussion to me
> but you weren't man enough to admit you never kill-filed me in
> alt.fast-food, which is the reason your posting to BOTH r.f.c and a.f.f.

> Admit it!  Why post such crap to r.f.c where you already admitted you
> never
> kilf-filed me there from?

>"sf" <s...@geemail.com> wrote in message
>news:6cr5f5p4udt5l7pqp4g5flev5905c4crcv@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:17:33 -0600, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost>
>> wrote:

>>>On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:32 -0800, sf wrote:

>>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:04:54 -0500, "Robert"
>>>> <racemaildrop-7x10gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>>Thanks and your welcome, Now you just need to lighten up this is not
>>>>>Sunday
>>>>>school or the library. You have to work but sometimes you just have to
>>>>>have
>>>>>fun.

>>>> Tell you what.  I'll stay in rfc if you stay in aff.

>>>As she posts to aff-f...

>>>Like I said, sf is just trolling.  You're it.

>> yep.  You brought this sh*t to rfc, now you're getting it back.  Stop
>> cross posting and I will too.

>SF You removed aff-f

>Now your threatening to continue to crosspost till he gives in but you
>already stopped?

>> Your intenetions are quit obvious.  You wanted to start a discussion to me
>> but you weren't man enough to admit you never kill-filed me in
>> alt.fast-food, which is the reason your posting to BOTH r.f.c and a.f.f.

>> Admit it!  Why post such crap to r.f.c where you already admitted you never
>> kilf-filed me there from?

>You're spreading the babble-talk on a little too thick.  Even the
>Original Jerry was a little more coherent than that.

>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:20:11 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:42:13 -0800 (PST), Food Snob® wrote:

>>>> I make no secret of who I am.  You, and everyone else knows my real
>>>> name and my location.

>>> You're Steve Austin!

>>> OK.  I admit.  I'm Bryan/Food Snob/Bobo The Clown, too.

>> steve never sleeps!

> I have one of those 'Threesome Alarm Clocks'.  It will wake up to
> three people on three different schedules.  I use it to wake up me,
> myself, and I so we can start posting as other people for a few
> hours each.

> It's tough work considering I have a day job, too.

> -sw

>> Your intenetions are quit obvious.  You wanted to start a discussion to me
>> but you weren't man enough to admit you never kill-filed me in
>> alt.fast-food, which is the reason your posting to BOTH r.f.c and a.f.f.

>> Admit it!  Why post such crap to r.f.c where you already admitted you never
>> kilf-filed me there from?

> You're spreading the babble-talk on a little too thick.  Even the
> Original Jerry was a little more coherent than that.

> -sw

>>Jerry a little information for you if you kill-file someone in your news
>>reader it spans to all groups.

> Not true with my newsreader.  My choices are global or local (current
> group).

>>> Steve/Robert/Jerry - I can't wade through all this thread.  You've
>>> entirely too much time on your hands.  Pick a favorite charity, work
>>> for Habitat for Humanity, go for a hike, but at least pick something
>>> meaningful.

>> Oh please.  I'll agree this is total silliness but it's confined to
>> one thread and easily killfiled.  A dead cat occupied MULTIPLE threads
>> for a whole day and nobody said anything except for Greg and Barb in
>> tactful jabs.  Yet a few people being playful get everyone in a
>> dither.  From what I noticed the only hostility came from those who
>> didn't know what was going on.  It's real simple, just don't read the
>> thread.

>I don't mind when peeps post about their deceased pets or SO's or bad luck
>or health or whatever but I'm always slightly taken aback by those who have
>to *immediately* run to a Usenet group full of strangers to post about the
>matter. Wayne is a prime example, his cat's death is simply the latest
>example, he's done this with his health and financial problems and such
>like.  Doesn't Wayne have *anyone* in real life with which he can share his
>various travails?  I've had similar stuff happen over the years but the
>*last* thing I'd do is barge onto Usenet to cry about it, I'd be
>commiserating with friends or family or whatever about the matter at hand
>and I'd *totally* forget about Usenet...

>Anyways, maybe I'm just different in that I think it's more than slightly
>embarrassing to post *every* maudlin detail of one's own personal life on a
>public forum.  My first reaction is:  "They must be lonely, don't they have
>any friends or family or at the least a priest or rabbi or shrink in which
>to confide...???".  I mean Wayne has a *partner*, fer chrissakes...

>Wayne (and yes, I don't like him, but he's simply the latest handiest
>"example", lol) reminds me of some "Lonely Hearts" type who is sitting next
>to you on a barstool and is so needy and clinging that he is immediately
>your new "best friend"...very self-centered and immature IMNSHO...and in the
>end a very repellant personality.  IOW an emotional "user"...and also
>completely clueless, they eventually end up wondering why others avoid them.

>> And by the way,  I also see you're involved in (yet another) thread
>> with a poster about a deceased child.   I'm fumbling for the word, but
>> hypocrite comes to mind.

>You said it, I didn't, Lou...

>:-)

>PS:  Just for the record I'm sorry that Wayne's cat Mr. Bailey passed on, he
>sounded like a lovely pet, but my sympathies are *entirely* with Mr. Bailey,
>*not* Wayne...

>>Jerry Sauk wrote:

>>> FUCK OFF SQWERTZ

>>http://www.google.it/search?hl=it&source=hp&q=bipolar+disorder&meta=&...

> Bipolar?  More like a personality disorder.

> http://www.mhawestchester.org/diagnoseadult/apersonality.asp#antisocial
> Antisocial Personality Disorder is a pervasive pattern of violation
> and disregard for others' rights, which begins in childhood and
> continues into adulthood.

>>>> Steve/Robert/Jerry - I can't wade through all this thread.  You've
>>>> entirely too much time on your hands.  Pick a favorite charity,
>>>> work for Habitat for Humanity, go for a hike, but at least pick
>>>> something meaningful.

>>> Oh please.  I'll agree this is total silliness but it's confined to
>>> one thread and easily killfiled.  A dead cat occupied MULTIPLE
>>> threads for a whole day and nobody said anything except for Greg
>>> and Barb in tactful jabs.  Yet a few people being playful get
>>> everyone in a dither.  From what I noticed the only hostility came
>>> from those who didn't know what was going on.  It's real simple,
>>> just don't read the thread.

>> I don't mind when peeps post about their deceased pets or SO's or
>> bad luck or health or whatever but I'm always slightly taken aback
>> by those who have to *immediately* run to a Usenet group full of
>> strangers to post about the matter. Wayne is a prime example, his
>> cat's death is simply the latest example, he's done this with his
>> health and financial problems and such like.  Doesn't Wayne have
>> *anyone* in real life with which he can share his various travails?
>> I've had similar stuff happen over the years but the *last* thing
>> I'd do is barge onto Usenet to cry about it, I'd be commiserating
>> with friends or family or whatever about the matter at hand and I'd
>> *totally* forget about Usenet...

>> Anyways, maybe I'm just different in that I think it's more than
>> slightly embarrassing to post *every* maudlin detail of one's own
>> personal life on a public forum.  My first reaction is:  "They must
>> be lonely, don't they have any friends or family or at the least a
>> priest or rabbi or shrink in which to confide...???".  I mean Wayne
>> has a *partner*, fer chrissakes...

>> Wayne (and yes, I don't like him, but he's simply the latest handiest
>> "example", lol) reminds me of some "Lonely Hearts" type who is
>> sitting next to you on a barstool and is so needy and clinging that
>> he is immediately your new "best friend"...very self-centered and
>> immature IMNSHO...and in the end a very repellant personality.  IOW
>> an emotional "user"...and also completely clueless, they eventually
>> end up wondering why others avoid them.

>>> And by the way,  I also see you're involved in (yet another) thread
>>> with a poster about a deceased child.   I'm fumbling for the word,
>>> but hypocrite comes to mind.

>> You said it, I didn't, Lou...

>> :-)

>> PS:  Just for the record I'm sorry that Wayne's cat Mr. Bailey
>> passed on, he sounded like a lovely pet, but my sympathies are
>> *entirely* with Mr. Bailey, *not* Wayne...

> Okay, hypocrite fits... but what about a word for someone who posts
> publicly about the passing of their pet but then uses their killfilter
> to pick and choose whose condolences to hear?

> I'll do you one better, Greg... I'm truly sorry for Mr. Baily... but I
> truly wish it were that child molesting POS Duh'Wayne who dropped
> dead... I'm kinda counting on the friggin' scourge not making it until
> 2010.

>> "Gregory Morrow" wrote:
>>> Lou Decruss wrote:
>>>> "Dora" <limey...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>> Steve/Robert/Jerry - I can't wade through all this thread.  You've
>>>>> entirely too much time on your hands.  Pick a favorite charity,
>>>>> work for Habitat for Humanity, go for a hike, but at least pick
>>>>> something meaningful.

>>>> Oh please.  I'll agree this is total silliness but it's confined to
>>>> one thread and easily killfiled.  A dead cat occupied MULTIPLE
>>>> threads for a whole day and nobody said anything except for Greg
>>>> and Barb in tactful jabs.  Yet a few people being playful get
>>>> everyone in a dither.  From what I noticed the only hostility came
>>>> from those who didn't know what was going on.  It's real simple,
>>>> just don't read the thread.

>>> I don't mind when peeps post about their deceased pets or SO's or
>>> bad luck or health or whatever but I'm always slightly taken aback
>>> by those who have to *immediately* run to a Usenet group full of
>>> strangers to post about the matter. Wayne is a prime example, his
>>> cat's death is simply the latest example, he's done this with his
>>> health and financial problems and such like.  Doesn't Wayne have
>>> *anyone* in real life with which he can share his various travails?
>>> I've had similar stuff happen over the years but the *last* thing
>>> I'd do is barge onto Usenet to cry about it, I'd be commiserating
>>> with friends or family or whatever about the matter at hand and I'd
>>> *totally* forget about Usenet...

>>> Anyways, maybe I'm just different in that I think it's more than
>>> slightly embarrassing to post *every* maudlin detail of one's own
>>> personal life on a public forum.  My first reaction is:  "They must
>>> be lonely, don't they have any friends or family or at the least a
>>> priest or rabbi or shrink in which to confide...???".  I mean Wayne
>>> has a *partner*, fer chrissakes...

>>> Wayne (and yes, I don't like him, but he's simply the latest handiest
>>> "example", lol) reminds me of some "Lonely Hearts" type who is
>>> sitting next to you on a barstool and is so needy and clinging that
>>> he is immediately your new "best friend"...very self-centered and
>>> immature IMNSHO...and in the end a very repellant personality.  IOW
>>> an emotional "user"...and also completely clueless, they eventually
>>> end up wondering why others avoid them.

>>>> And by the way,  I also see you're involved in (yet another) thread
>>>> with a poster about a deceased child.   I'm fumbling for the word,
>>>> but hypocrite comes to mind.

>>> You said it, I didn't, Lou...

>>> :-)

>>> PS:  Just for the record I'm sorry that Wayne's cat Mr. Bailey
>>> passed on, he sounded like a lovely pet, but my sympathies are
>>> *entirely* with Mr. Bailey, *not* Wayne...

>> Okay, hypocrite fits... but what about a word for someone who posts
>> publicly about the passing of their pet but then uses their killfilter
>> to pick and choose whose condolences to hear?

>The smarmy WEAZEL mentioned you IIRC, so you *know* that all that "killfile"
>hoo-ha is simply sheer BUNK...*especially* when he is crybabying for
>sympathy.

><chuckle>

>> I'll do you one better, Greg... I'm truly sorry for Mr. Baily... but I
>> truly wish it were that child molesting POS Duh'Wayne who dropped
>> dead... I'm kinda counting on the friggin' scourge not making it until
>> 2010.

>I can't disagree with a *word* you've said, Sheldon, those are my thoughts
>*exactly*...

>:-)

>I'll add that last summer Wayne came on here crying about not having 800 or
>so bux to repair their A/C unit during the hot Arizona summer, homeowner
>Wayne and his partner had to borrow money from friends to tide them over
>until payday.  I remember him saying that when they came home their pets
>were dead (their fish) or practically expired.from the extreme heat, and Mr.
>Bailey was in especially bad shape.  That heat incident surely did nothing
>good for Mr. Bailey's health, if Lil' Wayne was not such an irresponsible
>DEADBEAT I bet he'd still be alive today...

>And now we know why Lil' Wayne doesn't have much in the way of "friends",
>lol...who wants a deadbeat MOOCH like him for a friend...!!!???

>Throw the puke in a cage, I say, and give Lil' Wayne's pets to a
>*responsible* home...

>Judge Judy has spoken - BAM...!!!