Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Oct 23 2009 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
Comment by Jim.
================= On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, socratus <isra...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thank you for zeroing in of the heart of the issues. Light quanta is
> What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
what exhibits relative energy and everything including space time is exhibited by perception of relative energy. > More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created
As Feynman proclaimed, nothing in quantum logical electro dynamical
> but the discussions about it are still going on . > I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & Vacuum)
> One of the SRT laws says:
kinetic action is like a particle or a wave. > It is the same as to compare the elephant and the whale.
We can say momentum was exchanged between electrons by the change in
> We can see the elephant in the safari and the whale in the > ocean. But we cannot meet them together in the same > reference frame. momentum state they exhibit. But our notion that "something" transferred the momentum, the photon and the anti photon, cannot be modeled as a particles or a waves. > Therefore I say the SRT is theory about Light Quanta.
Equal and opposite quantum logical action, exhiobits kinetic momentum
transfer, experienced as "the electrodynamics of moving bodies", is the title of Einstein's 1905 paper introducing special relativity.. > Once again:
I must stipulate that this is by local measurement according to your
> The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant > equal to : c=1. In the Vacuum !!! own ruler and clock. Light appears slower in a relatively denser vacuum although measurement in the denser quantum logical electro dynamical kinetic structure are non the wiser and experience no effect of compaction of their rulers or slowing of their clocks They measure light speed as constant with respect to their rules no matter how long others figure their rulers to be relatively. The length of the ruler never changes locally independent of motion or local mass/energy density as it is perceived relatively. > The conditions of safari created the geometrical form of elephant.
The geometrical form of the light quanta is two dimensional, equal and
> The conditions of ocean created the geometrical form of the whale. > Then we must suppose that the conditions of Vacuum have the > influence on the geometrical form of Light Quanta. opposite change in quantum logical electro dynamical kinnetic space time. A 10 meter antenna receives photons ten meters in size and can receive half the photons twice that size and so on by increases size exhibited by delay elements in the curcuit. An electron state changes by the effective distance of the size of the photon, x=c*h/e, locally in logical state space and fraction of collective space time. > Question: What are the conditions of Vacuum ?
This is a contrested point. The vacuum energy has the effect of 185
> 1. > The matter ( and its density) in the Universe is very small. Giga Electron Volts per cubic centimeter. As John Wheeler proclaimed, the vacuum is only marginally less dense than matter. At the same time, the vacuum is the zero point we measure relative to. We only measure values directly that are higher than the vacuum energy. We see energy flow from high energy to low. We can never see them directly going below the vacuum energy as that is the lowest energy around. It is not that the vacuum energy is small, it is that it necessariily appears to be zero independent of how much energy it contains. > This small mass cannot roll the Universe into sphere therefore
This does not follow exactly. We cake an error of catagory
> the Universe must be infinite. considering a photon a rest mass. As the photon has no rest mass it cannot be considered a small mass. It's mass is determined by its energy by e=m*c^2. That it does not exhibit a rest mass locally does not mean the universe is not contained in finite time. At the same time, photons looping logically do exhibit a rest frame and thus a rest mass. Photons slowed by mass density or relative motion in their local space appear slower than light and thus exhibit a rest frame. Certainly the observable universe is contained in finite time and the existence of unobservables is dubious. Belief that anything infinite has been constructed in finite time is contradicted by the necessity of renormalization of quantum logical system to remove all infinities to get the answers that agree with experience. > 2.
If we believe the second law of thermodynamics we are falsly led to
> This infinite space is Kingdom of Cold. > Now it is considered that the temperature of this Kingdom > is: T= 2,7K. But this quantity is not constant, it is relative > and decreases, and in the future will reach T= 0K. > and the laws of thermodynamics say: the particles in the > Kingdom of Cold (T= 0K) cannot have volume. It means > they are flat particles. And from all flat geometrical forms > the most symmetrical is circle: c/d= pi = 3,14 …… the conclusion that T goes to zero in finite time. However, this is impossible by the third law of thermodynamics. When a system achives motion to the mazimal entropy, T=0, the motion that brings it to that state cannot be stopped and any motion moves it away from equalibrim. Absolute zero can never be obtained by a thermodynamic system. But the issue is much deeper than this. We can achieve extremely low
> 3.
No. Equal and opposite kinetic quantum logical action need not
> According to Quantum Theory the Vacuum is some kind > of energetic space, it means the particles, the Light Quanta > are also some kind of energetic power. involve any change in energy. Action of change of state to a higher or lower energy is a matter of relative perspective. The notion of energy emerges, it is not fundimental. It is true that higher energy determines the clocking of quantum logical interaction from our perspective by there is nothing preferred about our perspective. > All discussions are tautology without understanding what Vacuum is.
We have no call to presume anything exists besides equal and opposite
quantum logical interactions. What we call the vacuum is simply the space and time exhibited by delays in quantum logical interaction. What we consider physical distance, is the perceived logical distance of logic propagating at light speed locally according to our physical logical perspective and logical action at the speed of light. > So, in my opinion, the Quantum of Light is some kind of
Well, it exhibits two half dimensional vectors, one lateral and one
> energetic particle with flat geometrical form of circle. transverse, so if is certainly flat. In that it obeys half spin networks at any relative frequency we can consider its cycle as a sort of a circle. That the linear momentum exhibited is a two pi multiple the angular momentum supports this circular view. But, is is not actually a particle or a circle. As you have already
> But if the Quantum of Light always moves only with constant
It is so mad, the direction of travel is not even necessarily the same
> speed c=1, then, it seems, it is a mad particle. Thinking in such > way it is hard to understand its importance in our life. for all observers. The perceived logical ordering depends on both position and motion. > But SRT helps us to understand that this view on the Quantum
What is constant is our perception of light speed, or the rate of
> of Light is wrong. The SRT says: its laws depend on the movement > of the Quantum of Light. > Once again. > The SRT laws (Lorentz transformation ) explain us how the behaviour > ( movement ) of the Quantum of Light changes. > The theory says : in the movement > a) the mass and energy of Quantum of Light changes. > b) the geometrical form (circle) of Quantum of Light changes > c) the time of its life changes. > (according to Lorentz transformation ) quantum logical kinetic electro dynamical interaction locally. What covaries is the perception of space time and energy relatively as far as everyone else is concerned from other positions and varying relative motion. Logical interactions are absolute, but their orderings and size, and thus how much space and time they exhibit is only relative. What we call space and time is that which is exhibited locally. There is no global preferred notion of size or time. Only the direction of time is absolute, as interaction events are
The notion of the moving flat circular twist, right handed to exchange
Jim
> ==== .
> Best wishes > Israel Sadovnik. Socratus > http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&i...
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||