<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Epistemology Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology</link>
  <description>You are invited to join our group to discuss epistemology and give your view on questions such as: What is science, what is knowledge and what is logic? Are there absolute and universal rules? Is quantum theory superior? Is there just one universe? How does research influence its outcome?</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, johnreed modified 11/23/09</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/c787bc40a82a3576/5ccd9ef8cbd90c5c?show_docid=5ccd9ef8cbd90c5c</link>
  <description>
  The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics &lt;br&gt; November 20, 2009, Modified November 23, 2009 &lt;br&gt; John Lawrence Reed, Jr. &lt;br&gt; Section 4a &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Angular Momentum &lt;br&gt; Angular mass momentum is the spin analog of Newton’s first law. We &lt;br&gt; start an object spinning in free (unencumbered) space and it will
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/c787bc40a82a3576/5ccd9ef8cbd90c5c?show_docid=5ccd9ef8cbd90c5c</guid>
  <author>
  thejohnlr...@gmail.com
  (johnlawrencereedjr)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:20:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Quantum Adventure - Webconference</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/6561525950691e26/cf66295ed04613bf?show_docid=cf66295ed04613bf</link>
  <description>
  I am a theoretical physicist and I will be scheduling a webconference on &lt;br&gt; &#39;Entanglement and Quantum Teleportation&#39;. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;To join the meeting, please register at: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.quantumadventure.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you need some assistance, feel free to contact me. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards, &lt;br&gt; Matheus.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/6561525950691e26/cf66295ed04613bf?show_docid=cf66295ed04613bf</guid>
  <author>
  matheus.quan...@gmail.com
  (Matheus Lobo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [epistemology 10983] Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/138c551feed00a97/f457b83f6484a48c?show_docid=f457b83f6484a48c</link>
  <description>
  ============ &lt;br&gt; Sorin: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;============== &lt;br&gt; G: &lt;br&gt; Why modern? The Stern–Gerlach experiment was meant to test &lt;br&gt; the Bohr–Sommerfeld hypothesis. &lt;br&gt; Now, Bohr Model is prehistory. &lt;br&gt; It was succeeded by the Schroedinger function based QM, which &lt;br&gt; is history. &lt;br&gt; Modern quantum physics started with replacement of Schroedinger
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/138c551feed00a97/f457b83f6484a48c?show_docid=f457b83f6484a48c</guid>
  <author>
  zg...@yahoo.com
  (Georges Metanomski)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:02:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/138c551feed00a97/847aeb3c1cf2d7a2?show_docid=847aeb3c1cf2d7a2</link>
  <description>
  Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Stern and Gerlach experiment is one of the most representative &lt;br&gt; experiments in quantum mechanic. The experiment simplicity was &lt;br&gt; completed with a complicate and absurd quantum explanation. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;A new ,,common sense” explanation for the experiment has been
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/138c551feed00a97/847aeb3c1cf2d7a2?show_docid=847aeb3c1cf2d7a2</guid>
  <author>
  sorincosof...@yahoo.com
  (sorin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:02:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/e0bb5df2a1324462?show_docid=e0bb5df2a1324462</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ll try to duck the shit storm of names that have hit GMeta&#39;s &lt;br&gt; metaphorical fan as I have not heard of any of them. &lt;br&gt; The thing that has pissed me off this week is the colonization by the &lt;br&gt; Christian right (tautology?) of the word &amp;quot;Enlightenment&amp;quot;. This once &lt;br&gt; characterized the French Philosophes of the 18thC, in the 1960s, it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/e0bb5df2a1324462?show_docid=e0bb5df2a1324462</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:18:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [epistemology 10979] Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/e58a752a5dcfbe57?show_docid=e58a752a5dcfbe57</link>
  <description>
  Hi Neil, &lt;br&gt; You throw names about like shit, trying to hit the fan. Why the hell &lt;br&gt; should one hear about Bourbaki sets? It&#39;s bullshit, like all failed &lt;br&gt; trials to found maths in discreteness, only more conceited. &lt;br&gt; Same for others, with exception of Bachelard, who came here astray &lt;br&gt; and whom you don&#39;t seem to understand.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/e58a752a5dcfbe57?show_docid=e58a752a5dcfbe57</guid>
  <author>
  zg...@yahoo.com
  (Georges Metanomski)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:22:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [epistemology 10973] Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/f97539019c1246fa?show_docid=f97539019c1246fa</link>
  <description>
  Yes, Chazwin, there *is* that... and, I have also found *1:1 &lt;br&gt; correspondence*within &lt;br&gt; *cultural systems boundedness* as it relates to Levi-S&#39;s treatment of *imagery &lt;br&gt; created, perceived realities, the inherent symbolism, together with the &lt;br&gt; symptomatic aspects of the continued dialogue* that ensues from those
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/f97539019c1246fa?show_docid=f97539019c1246fa</guid>
  <author>
  chreod...@gmail.com
  (Timothy Monicken)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:04:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/72dfbb218b2c3090?show_docid=72dfbb218b2c3090</link>
  <description>
  I honestly suspect business schools were more radical 20 years ago &lt;br&gt; than the whole academy now. We are 100 years after Veblen though and &lt;br&gt; much more distanced from Nietzsche&#39;s &#39;On Truth and Lies in a Moral &lt;br&gt; Sense&#39; - which he kept secret. Bachelard is under-used here in the &lt;br&gt; &#39;rupture tradition&#39;. I&#39;d guess none of the kind of people you
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/72dfbb218b2c3090?show_docid=72dfbb218b2c3090</guid>
  <author>
  nwte...@googlemail.com
  (archytas)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:36:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/a4107ac6e2f5bffd?show_docid=a4107ac6e2f5bffd</link>
  <description>
  Okay let us accept that F might have got his BA on the basis that they &lt;br&gt; fail no one these days. I was wrong. However, given the state of the &lt;br&gt; establishment&#39;s grip on the balls of free-thinking and radical, new &lt;br&gt; and novel ideas F would not now have been given a position of power &lt;br&gt; inside a university. Neither would Chomsky or any thinker whose urge
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/a4107ac6e2f5bffd?show_docid=a4107ac6e2f5bffd</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:18:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/979f878021318393?show_docid=979f878021318393</link>
  <description>
  Foucault would no doubt have gleaned his BA by using those buses on &lt;br&gt; which French radicals gave out course credits saying the credits are &lt;br&gt; real but the university imaginary. In my class I would have responded &lt;br&gt; by offering you the MA there and then as it&#39;s so damned obvious we &lt;br&gt; never fail anyone. You would be able to rejoin the course at any time
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/979f878021318393?show_docid=979f878021318393</guid>
  <author>
  nwte...@googlemail.com
  (archytas)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:35:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/a8ae7e60e8cd01e8?show_docid=a8ae7e60e8cd01e8</link>
  <description>
  Yeah I followed you recommendation to go there - thanks. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve been busy telling idiot Americans the difference between a rights &lt;br&gt; based approach to health and they respond by participating in their &lt;br&gt; own exploitation by calling public medicine &amp;quot;socialist&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Blimey - banned? &lt;br&gt; I know it is moderated but you have to go the extra mile to get
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/a8ae7e60e8cd01e8?show_docid=a8ae7e60e8cd01e8</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:07:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/38cae0c567351ea9?show_docid=38cae0c567351ea9</link>
  <description>
  Camus was in the advanced guard of the French posty philosophers. &lt;br&gt; I read his Myth of Sysyphus whilst undergoing all that nasty cancer &lt;br&gt; treatment last year, and his reflections on suicide helped me prepare &lt;br&gt; myself for the worst. &lt;br&gt; I hope to revisit him soon. &lt;br&gt; 6 weeks ago I signed up for an MA in Intellectual History, which I am
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/38cae0c567351ea9?show_docid=38cae0c567351ea9</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:14:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: B.O.DI.C.E.A. C.A.N.C.E.R.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/1f7984c99d58fb31/9d9bd7e53eab8270?show_docid=9d9bd7e53eab8270</link>
  <description>
  Does this posting have any meaning at all? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;On Nov 10, 4:04 am, &amp;quot;Serenity Smiles&amp;quot; &amp;lt;gentle.esse...@hotmail.co.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/1f7984c99d58fb31/9d9bd7e53eab8270?show_docid=9d9bd7e53eab8270</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:59:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/26467fb4de9d3875?show_docid=26467fb4de9d3875</link>
  <description>
  When I was doing archaeology I always found C Levi-S&#39;s technique of &lt;br&gt; conceptual oppositions very useful for the interpretation of building &lt;br&gt; distributions, iconography and spatiality.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/26467fb4de9d3875?show_docid=26467fb4de9d3875</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:16:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [epistemology 10926] Claude Levi-Strauss dies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/953557228fcb118e?show_docid=953557228fcb118e</link>
  <description>
  Yes, I remember his work well... he had great influence on my thinking as it &lt;br&gt; concerned the field research in Cultural Anthropology. Though I felt his &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;binary code&amp;quot; primarily applied to cultural myth &amp;amp; perspective to be &lt;br&gt; somewhat limiting, there was that element of the paradoxical tensions &lt;br&gt; created when the chief elements or proponents found in the classical sets of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.my/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/3d906bddb68a1406/953557228fcb118e?show_docid=953557228fcb118e</guid>
  <author>
  chreod...@gmail.com
  (Timothy Monicken)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:29:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
